Alright, I’m probably trying to do something the utterly wrong way, but here goes:

Alright, I’m probably trying to do something the utterly wrong way, but here goes:

Is there a way to tell eigenbrowser to take an action from belcanto?  I can see how the browser button in the percussion keys operates, and watch it move around the eigenbrowser, and tapping on it makes it do things.  So, if i do “eigenbrowser , interpreter hey script browse” it goes into the scripts menu, and I could move around, but I’d rather have a script drive and do the selection for me (so that I can bake a small ‘kicker’ into a talker button, instead of having to bake an entire script into a talker button..)

I was hoping it would be something like “eigenbrowser , interpreter hey script 2 choose” and so forth, but that errors out.. 

I’m trying to send a specific MIDI note using Talker and Player agents.

I’m trying to send a specific MIDI note using Talker and Player agents.  I’ve included a screen shot of the test setup below.  The Belanco does not through errors.  I’m hoping its just some silly omission on my part.

The purpose for this is to build a key group to control Ableton Live’s session view (arm tracks, select scenes, etc.).

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

Randy

Im finding that getting the sustain (damper) from the Pico when using the soundfonts (particular the Piano) requires…

Im finding that getting the sustain (damper) from the Pico when using the soundfonts (particular the Piano) requires a pretty big input. Is there anyway to reduce this? 

i.e. make it more sensitive, bit like the breath compression on the clarinet?

Ive tried playing with damper max, and curve but doesnt seem to help…

Im thinking I might need to add a rangers or shaper in WB, but wondered if I was missing something more obvious, or was doing some wrong.

About a year ago, Samplemodelling brought out their own platform (SWAM) as they introduced a new Soprano Sax.

About a year ago, Samplemodelling brought out their own platform (SWAM) as they introduced a new Soprano Sax. They have now upgraded all their sax instruments to the SWAM engine (from Kontakt).

This seems to be a great step forward. I’ve upgraded and found:

the 32bit AUs work great with the Eigenharp. You can do as little as just set the breathpipe to output MIDI BC or you can get more elabourate.

the 32 bit VSTs do not work (they show a blank UI screen.

EigenD (you know this, right) does not support 64bit plugins.

It takes a bit of practice to ensure that you play legato only when you want but nothing really challenging.

These are sample based but also do modelling so they are more CPU intense that just samples but less than a full model approach.

I find them much more realistic than any sample-only sax I’ve tried but less so that, say, the VL1 PM sax sounds (which benefit from tweaking for the Eigenharp. 

http://www.samplemodeling.com/en/products_saxophones.php//cdn.embedly.com/widgets/platform.js

As a first step for an EigenDVST bridge I am investigating an “OSC portal” agent atm that converts all kinds of…

As a first step for an EigenDVST bridge I am investigating an “OSC portal” agent atm that converts all kinds of EigenD events (including key and audio) to OSC and back.

Am still at the beginning of diving into the deeper realms of OSC. OSC seems to be a very general protocol that offers a lot of freedom how to do things (which ports are supported, what is the “protocol” spoken over them etc.) So: Does anybody know whether “pseudo standard” ways how to encode key, modulation and audio events in OSC were established between OSC capable software already – optimally ones that are capable enough to map the EigenD event system to them? (E.g. I found a “MIDI Bridge” that converts MIDI to OSC and vice versa – probably an interesting “OSC profile” to support – but presumably not capable enough for all EigenD events – e.g. for sending events between EigenD instances on the same or different machines. Perhaps already sufficient for the MIDI side of an OSC sending/receiving VST plugin made to communicate with EigenD though (as VST input is MIDI anyways).

Thus probably the portal will have to support different “OSC profiles”. Question is now: which should that be to cover the most ground – and to be able to map the EigenD event system to at least one of them?

http://hexler.net/docs/touchosc-configuration-connections-bridge//cdn.embedly.com/widgets/platform.js

Hi

Hi,

Got my Pico a few weeks back, and been getting used to it, thanks to Geerts excellent videos on youtube. They have been excellent, and I feel pretty comfortable on it now, after a short period of time.

Im a software engineer by profession, and have played a bit of piano in the past, but this is something very different, and im enjoying the mix if tech and music – though ironically my preference is for classical music 🙂

I compose and perform jazzy ambient music.

I compose and perform jazzy ambient music.  Once (always) a saxophonist, now I use an EWI and Eigenharps to introduce my ideas.  I enjoy building up the layers of a piece using various DAW and loop software (Reason, Reaper, Studio One, Live), while also performing live and raw.

You can find many of my recent offerings on my website {randybrown.us}

http://randybrown.us//cdn.embedly.com/widgets/platform.js